Still a few days left to respond to Public Consultation on Enforcement Directive

Bruno doesn't have much to say,
but perhaps you do?
Looking for something to do this weekend or the next few days?

Our friends at the EU Commission wish to let IPKat readers know that a possible idea to fill any gap you might have is to answer the Public Consultation on the evaluation and modernisation of the legal framework for the enforcement of intellectual property rights.

The deadline is 15 April 2016.

The consultation aims to help assess the functioning of Directive 2004/48/EC on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRED) in the online environment, with a view to identify the possible need for adapting such provisions and to propose corrective measures. 

It will gather experience on the use and impact of IPRED and also seek views and opinions from those concerned with the application of the Directive on its functioning and the possible need for amendments. 

It also aims to gather experience and opinions about the use and impact of so-called 'follow the money' initiatives in the area of IPR enforcement.

Further details and questions here.
Still a few days left to respond to Public Consultation on Enforcement Directive Still a few days left to respond to Public Consultation on Enforcement Directive Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Wednesday, April 06, 2016 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.